Sunday, October 21, 2012

Blog 9



I am doing Claudius for my A3.  For this close reading, I am looking at his soliloquy when Hamlet thinks he is praying, and decides not to kill him, because he doesn’t want to send Claudius to Heaven.

O, my offence is rank, it smells to heaven;
It hath the primal eldest curse upon't,
A brother's murther! Pray can I not,
Though inclination be as sharp as will.
My stronger guilt defeats my strong intent,
And, like a man to double business bound,
I stand in pause where I shall first begin,
And both neglect. What if this cursed hand
Were thicker than itself with brother's blood,
Is there not rain enough in the sweet heavens
To wash it white as snow? Whereto serves mercy
But to confront the visage of offence?
And what's in prayer but this twofold force,
To be forestalled ere we come to fall,
Or pardon'd being down? Then I'll look up;
My fault is past. But, O, what form of prayer
Can serve my turn? 'Forgive me my foul murther'?
That cannot be; since I am still possess'd
Of those effects for which I did the murther-
My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen.
May one be pardon'd and retain th' offence?
In the corrupted currents of this world
Offence's gilded hand may shove by justice,
And oft 'tis seen the wicked prize itself
Buys out the law; but 'tis not so above.
There is no shuffling; there the action lies
In his true nature, and we ourselves compell'd,
Even to the teeth and forehead of our faults,
To give in evidence. What then? What rests?
Try what repentance can. What can it not?
Yet what can it when one cannot repent?
O wretched state! O bosom black as death!
O limed soul, that, struggling to be free,
Art more engag'd! Help, angels! Make assay.
Bow, stubborn knees; and heart with strings of steel,
Be soft as sinews of the new-born babe!
All may be well.

In the soliloquy, this is the second time Claudius has admitted his guilt (the first was his aside a little earlier).  In the first line, Claudius says his “offense is rank, it smells to heaven.”  This shows a disgust to his sin similar to that which Hamlet feels, and especially tries to convey to Gertrude.  However, his admission to guilt is not so one-sided.  When Claudius says his “stronger guilt defeats my strong intent,” it is hard to tell whether his guilt is very strong (all of a sudden) or if his intent was weaker than we thought—maybe killing his brother was not so coldly calculated.   Also, he refers to it later as a “visage of offense,” a mere appearance of sin.  Also, the three times “murder” is used in the soliloquy, each of those lines are not in iambic pentameter.  Murder is not as secure in Claudius’ thoughts, and we see real doubt for the first time in what Claudius has done.

The entire soliloquy basically centers around Claudius chance of going to Heaven.  He debates it constantly, questioning whether he could be forgiven.  In doing so, he lists the “effects for which I did the murder– My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen.”  In laying out these reasons, Claudius centers the sin upon his self, which is in contrast to earlier speeches, when he uses “we” and “our” to refer to the queen and crown.  
When looking at the meter of the lines, many are in iambic pentameter, but the ones that aren’t stand out.  “Heaven” is used twice in the entire soliloquy, and both times it ends a non iambic pentameter line in feminine rhyme.  This shows heaven is a major uncertainty for Claudius, and it comes to consume his thoughts.  “Mercy,” “prayer,” and “justice” also end several non-iambic pentameter lines, continuing the undermining of these aspects in Claudius’ life.  He shows no mercy to Hamlet in sending him to be killed, his prayer fails, and the justice that serves Claudius also wipes out the kingdom.  

How do you think the different type of feet (like a trochee) makes a word like “murder” more significant than just a variation from the normal iambic pentameter?
Also, I feel like there should be a connection to the ghost, with all of Claudius’ mentions of heaven, but I’m not sure yet.

Blog Post #9 - Claudius Character Analysis


For my character analysis I will be analyzing Claudius. In the essay I plan to specifically examine the theme of public versus private self, and how Claudius assumes two very different roles and tones depending on whether his statements are made in public or to himself. For this blog post, I am analyzing Act I, Scene 2, Lines 1-16. In class, I believe this speech made by Claudius was likened to one made by Bill Clinton. Following is a copy of the excerpt:
Though yet of Hamlet our dear brother’s death
The memory be green, and that it us befitted
To bear our hearts in grief, and our whole kingdom
To be contracted in one brow of woe,
Yet so far hath discretion fought with nature
That we with wisest sorrow think on him
Together with remembrance of ourselves.
Therefore our sometime sister, now our queen,
Th’ imperial jointress to this warlike state,
Have we, as ‘twere with a defeated joy,
With an auspicious and a dropping eye,
With mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage,
In equal scale weighting delight and dole,
Taken to wife. Nor have we herein barred
Your better wisdoms, which have freely gone
With this affair along. For all, our thanks.

Claudius’ tone in this excerpt is serious and formal. It has largely political undertones, and is meant to present the King himself as appropriate, responsible and possessing the qualities of a leader. He begins by making an appeal to emotion, mentioning the death of his brother Hamlet, and the “green” memory that is all too familiar in the minds of those whom he addresses. He uses this pathos as a segue to discussing the current state of Denmark and its leadership. He uses words like “ourselves” to make it seem as though he refers to and embraces the entire kingdom, even though the speech itself is about his own selfish political ambitions. In this way, he spins the rhetoric in a way that makes him seem personable, as though he is looking out for all of his citizens. Using parallelism (“mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage”; “weighing delight and dole”), Claudius establishes a rhythm and a sense of credibility. Much like today’s political figures, there is a reassuring cadence to the speech.
I would like to further explore how the tone of voice and the style of speech change when Claudius is speaking alone (or in an aside). Thoughts, comments, and questions are much appreciated!

Ophelia "I shall the effect of this good lesson keep"


I want to expose Ophelia's underlying rebellion with my close readings. Her small speech in act 1, scene 3 exposes her hidden subversiveness. 

I shall the effect of this good lesson keep
-She’ll keep the effect of the lesson but not the direct lesson. Ophelia manipulates her words here to sound allegiant but really, she is sneakily subversive. If “I shall” is read as a troche, Ophelia puts emphasis on “I” rather than “you”, suggesting that she will adhere to her own interpretation of her brother’s words (as lenient as it may be) rather than her brother’s exact directions. A stress of “I” also connotes a strong sense of self and a value of her own ideals over those of her brother’s.

As watchmen to my heart, but, good my brother
-Ophelia uses the term “watchmen” rather than guard. If Laertes’ words acted as a guard, then she would keep Hamlet away entirely. However, a watchman is not quite as protective as a guard. Their job is more to monitor than to protect. This suggests that instead of completely staying away from Hamlet (as her brother intends for her to do) she will be cautious and take her brother’s words only as advice.
-This line is catalytic iambic pentameter with the second syllable of “brother” falling on the extra beat. This weakens the role of her brother, reinforcing her subversive stance towards her brother’s advice. It also creates a contrast with her stress of the word “I” in the previous line. She is strong while her brother is weak.
-Her use of the word "but" allows her to outline a particular condition to her adherence to her brother's words. This give her the power, rather than her brother. 

Do not come as ungracious pastors do,
-Pastors are figures of purity and chastity. She casts them in a negative light, suggesting their typical ungraciousness. This suggests Ophelia's opposition to a life of celibacy and sexual purity, reinforcing her opposition to her brother's advice. 

Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
-"Show me" is an iamb placing the stress on the word "me" once again establishing her as the dominant figure in the exchange. 
-Her negative characterization of both pastors and heaven imply that she doesn't feel that striving toward purity with the ultimate goal of heaven is worth it. The path to heaven is extremely painful and even those who devote their lives to religion have a very difficult time walking it. Why should she even have to try?
-Second syllable of heaven is unstressed (feminine rhyme). Ophelia does not see Heaven as her ultimate goal, she feels no real conviction towards reaching it. The idea of heaven is weak and, ultimately, not worth the pain that is necessary to arrive there.

Whiles like a puffed and reckless libertine
-"Libertine" ends the line on a masculine rhyme, giving strength to the idea of freedom and recklessness, especially when compared to heaven. 
-"Puffed" and "reckless" are much lighter, more positive words than "steep" and "thorny" which are used to describe the path to heaven. 
-Stark contrast drawn between the confining and painful path to heaven, and the reckless, open experience of freedom.

Himself the path of primrose dalliance treads
-"Himself" is an iamb with "him" unstressed. Could reflect her ongoing elevation of her own strength and her brother's (the him) weak suggestions at unnecessary purity and piousness. 
-The path of a reckless life is so much more beautiful than the path the heaven. "Primrose", and "dalliance" are both positive and open words. Instead of using any negative words to describe a life of hedonism (which would make more sense in reference to the time period and her supposed role in society) she characterizes an unchaste life as preferable to the path of heaven. 

And recks not his own reed.
-Suggests that nothing bad really comes from treading the path of primrose dalliance. 
-There is a downside to working towards heaven (a painful life with no real pay off) but a life of dalliance is both pleasurable and unpunished. 

Ophelia

In III.i.1841, it's like Ophelia has some sort of sense ADD when she's describing how Hamlet was versus how he is.


O, what a noble mind is here o'erthrown!
The courtier's, scholar's, soldier's, eye, tongue, sword,
Th' expectancy and rose of the fair state,
The glass of fashion and the mould of form,
Th' observ'd of all observers- quite, quite down!
And I, of ladies most deject and wretched,
That suck'd the honey of his music vows,
Now see that noble and most sovereign reason,
Like sweet bells jangled, out of tune and harsh;
That unmatch'd form and feature of blown youth
Blasted with ecstasy. O, woe is me
T' have seen what I have seen, see what I see!

The references to sight are the most numerous - glass of fashion and mould of form, observ'd of all observers, unmatch'd form and feature of blown youth, t'have seen what I have seen, see what I see.

However, sound is another big theme. Honey of his music vows, sweet bells jangled, out of tune and harsh.

The most interesting part is the connotation of the words that she associates with each different sensation. The physical aspect she describes have these reverent adjectives attached to them, such as unmatch'd, or delicate and pleasing to the mind's eye, such as glass of fashion. Although she may be disillusioned by how much he loves her, the physical aspects of Hamlet have not changed at all. They are still intact and the glass remains unbroken.

The audio, however, is marred. The word jangled is harsh coming off the tongue and to the ear, as seen by the additional out of tune and harsh. In addition, even 'sucking' the honey of his music vows is not a pleasing image. Honey is sweet, but sometimes much too sweet, and sucking connotes a sort of gluttony to a substance that is quite disgusting in large amounts. In addition, vows always turn out tragically for Shakespearean lovers - those of Romeo and Juliet, those enchanted in Midsummer's Night Dream, etc.

So if everything she hears hurts but what she sees has these connotations of beauty, why "woe is me, to have seen what I have seen, see what I see?" Do Hamlet's harsh words hurt even more because Ophelia has seen the most beautiful aspects of him? Is she then choosing to focus on what is still crystalline and attractive, and thereafter ignore his harmful words?

Gertrude


Disclaimer: I wrote my last blog on Gertrude as well, so this might feel a bit forced, or like overkill. I want to develop my previous ideas about her relationship to death.
She tells Hamlet in her first lines to essentially "get over it", citing the inevitability of death... 
"Good Hamlet, cast thy nighted color off,
And let thine eye look like a friend on Denmark.
Do not for ever with thy vailed lids
Seek for thy noble father in the dust.
Thou know'st 'tis common. All that lives must die,
Passing through nature to eternity."
We discussed last class that the play goes from ghosts to skulls, from uncertainty to certainty, from death as deniable to a forced acceptance through the tangibility of the skulls. In saying "'tis common," Gertrude expresses her point of view that death is inevitable and happens to everyone. As the play progresses, I think the ghost symbol presents death as a question that the skulls answer toward the end.. but did Gertrude know that answer all along? What does this mean for her denial of Hamlet seeing the ghost? Is she really protecting him from being taken seriously by portraying him as crazy, or is she really expressing a premature view of the inevitability of death? This would mean she is more knowledgable/wise than he is, and has more control over herself and her situation than he does. 
At the same time, she also seems to lose certainty as the play moves forward. In describing Ophelia's death, as Ed pointed out, she personifies the inanimate objects around Ophelia, displacing the agency onto Ophelia. First of all, does this imply the weakness of the female characters, or could the displacement be a mechanism to move the blame away from Gertrude? Could it have been murder? Even if it wasn't, she was watching the whole time. Was Gertrude really helpless to stop Ophelia from drowning? What are her intentions, really? Anyway, back to the certainty idea, she seems to devolve from the "'tis common" thing to uncertainty, especially in this displacement of agency and ultimately in her last lines: "I am poisoned."I think she's an interesting juxtaposition in that way... if the play/Hamlet's view on death becomes more certain, and she becomes less certain, what does this imply? 
A much simpler question, in addition: How would you guys scan "I am poisoned"? Seems to me like either a trochaic dimeter or a spondee and a trochee. What might each imply in terms of tone/meaning, and how else could you scan/interpret that line?
And how do I distinguish in her one-liners between prose and poetry that I can scan? because I definitely scanned all of her lines, and honestly don't want that to go to waste... 

In addition, I'll re-post my other questions about Gertrude from last week, in case any of you guys have ideas. 
Gertrude seems very passive... is she a pawn or a manipulator? How does (or doesn't) Gertrude have agency/control over herself and the other characters?
When Hamlet equates Claudius with his mother by calling him "my mother," what might this imply for motherhood and feminization in the rest of the play?
What's more important/impactful; big grand gestures, or small subtle ones, like Gertrude's? Especially considering the advice Hamlet gives to the players to avoid vulgar, grandiose acting?





Blog #9: Close Reading on Fortinbras


I chose Fortinbras as my character. I’m still not 100% certain that I am going to do Fortinbras since he only talks like four times throughout the play. The audience is first introduced to him at the beginning of the play but through other characters’ words. I am interested in how he is referred to by other characters and then how he talks himself and if there are any similarities or differences.
I am also interested since Fortinbras has the last words in the entire play even though he is a minor character.
Another interesting idea is that Hamlet and Fortinbras are connected; Hamlet’s father killed Fortinbras’ father and both Hamlet and Fortinbras are trying to get revenge for their father. But they never actually interact with each other. They are also foils in the sense Fortinbras is an “active” character while Hamlet is not.

Close Reading time!!!
Fortinbras first words:

“This quarry cries on havoc. O proud Death
iamb iamb iamb iamb iamb
What feast is toward in thine eternal cell
iamb iamb iamb iamb iamb
That thou so many princes at a shot
iamb iamb iamb pyrrhic iamb
So bloodily hast struck.”
iamb pyrrhic iamb

The first lines from Fortinbras all are masculine rhyme. Fortinbras is talking about how all the characters are dead. Masculine rhyme emphasizes the definiteness of death. This is the end of the play and all the characters are dead – that is the end. He also comes in the play as confident with his lines since they end in stresses. He realizes that this is his time to take over the throne of Denmark. He does not always speak in pentameter. Perhaps Shakespeare is trying to differentiate him from the other characters. He is an outsider who comes in and achieves his goal of not just regaining his fathers’ lands of Norway but also the throne of Denmark.

The first time Fortinbras is mentioned to the audience is through Horatio:

“His fell to Hamlet. Now, sir, young Fortinbras,
iamb iamb anapest spondee iamb
Of unimproved mettle hot and full,
iamb iamb iamb iamb catalectic
Hath in the skirts of Norway here and there
trochee iamb iamb iamb iamb
Shark'd up a list of lawless resolutes,
trochee iamb iamb iamb iamb
For food and diet, to some enterprise
iamb iamb iamb iamb iamb
That hath a stomach in't; which is no other—
iamb iamb iamb anapest trochee
As it doth well appear unto our state--
iamb iamb iamb iamb iamb
But to recover of us, by strong hand
iamb iamb anapest iamb catalectic 
And terms compulsatory, those foresaid lands
iamb iamb iamb iamb iamb catalectic 
So by his father lost: and this, I take it,
iamb iamb iamb dactyl trochee
Is the main motive of our preparations,
trochee spondee anapest trochee trochee
The source of this our watch and the chief head
iamb iamb iamb pyrrhic spondee 
Of this post-haste and romage in the land.”
pyrrhic spondee iamb iamb iamb

In this scene, Horatio and Barnardo are discussing why they are on guard and why Denmark is manufacturing lots of weapons. Horatio then explains that the rumor is young Fortinbras wants to take back his father's land. Horatio talks in pentameter except for one line. Overall, he is being quite subjective of Fortinbras stating that he is bold but has yet to prove himself - "of unimproved mettle hot and full." This line ends on a catalectic which highlights that we aren't sure yet what to think of Fortinbras yet. Catalectics occur when Horatio is explaining that Fortinbras is attempting to get back his father's land. This means that it might happen but no one is certain; these are after all rumors. The fact that these lines end in masculine rhyme give off a connotation that Fortinbras will eventually avenge his father, even if it is deferred in Act II. Horatio's story about Fortinbras ends on the stressed word "lost" which not only means that Fortinbras' father lost his land but also his life. Shakespeare also uses some interesting terms with food, diet, and stomach. Literally, it means that Fortinbras is giving these lawless people food to fight for him but perhaps there is something deeper. Overall, it seems Horatio has the right idea about Fortinbras.

Some questions: 
Are my close readings okay?
Did I totally mess up the stress/unstress stuff? 
What do you think about Fortinbras as a character? Why did Shakespeare put him in? What is his purpose? 
Why do you think we never meet him until the very end and why does he get to end the play? 


Blog 9

I'm going to present Hamlet and Polonius as foils - they are both schemers, and they both use their plans to find knowledge. Hamlet sets up the Mousetrap play, and Polonius tells Ophelia to return Hamlet's letters to see his reaction. In the end, they both suffer similar fates. They are killed through tragic accidents that result from their scheming. From here I want to prove that they both cause each others' demises: Hamlet, of course, directly kills Polonius. Polonius' death is what causes all the action leading to the climax in Act 5. They are also both pawns - Hamlet of the ghost, and Polonius of Claudius.

I started off by close reading Polonius' long speech to Laertes on line 59 of Act 1 scene 3. Polonius tells Laertes to give his "thoughts no tongue" - he's telling Laertes to keep to himself, and to think before action. Essentially, he's telling him to be like Hamlet. Polonius also tells Laertes to, "Beware of entrance to a quarrel." Quarrel ends on a feminine rhyme, perhaps indicating that Laertes considers action weaker than thinking, the same kind of reverse thinking that applies to Hamlet.

I'm going to connect this to the part of my thesis about foils, leading to the intertwining fates idea. I haven't connected this to the pawns idea yet.